Martin Ayisi, the Chief Executive Officer of the Minerals Commission, has consistently voiced his opposition to recent demands for a complete ban on small-scale mining in Ghana, specifically targeting illegal mining, commonly known as “galamsey.”
Even in the face of the massive devastation of Ghana’s natural environment, Mr Ayisi continues to resist and fight against calls for total ban on illegal mining and scale mining. Mr Ayisi has been on media advocating against the ban which left many wondering and questioning his intention towards the country.
During his appearance before the Government Assurances Committee of Parliament on Monday, October 7, Ayisi argued against a blanket ban, which he believes would unfairly impact legal small-scale miners who are operating within the bounds of the law. He emphasized that the key issue lies with illegal operations, and a wholesale ban would unjustly punish those who are adhering to regulations.
“When you say ban small-scale mining, in my understanding, it means that no one is allowed to mine lawfully,” Ayisi said. “I understand the situation and the anger of Ghanaians, but the people who have followed due process and sunk boreholes will be punished because others along the Pra and Birim rivers are misbehaving.”
Ayisi further shared that he had advised the government and his minister against implementing an indiscriminate ban on small-scale mining. He argued that the solution lies in dealing specifically with illegal activities, not penalizing all miners.
“There are issues that need to be addressed, but a wholesale ban would not be the proper approach,” he added.
The illegal mining menace, known for its devastating impact on water bodies and forest reserves, has stirred public outcry, leading many associations, including Organised Labour, to demand a total ban on all forms of small-scale mining. Organised Labour has even planned a nationwide strike on October 10 to protest the government’s perceived failure to effectively curb illegal mining.
Despite this pressure, Ayisi remains firm in his position, advocating for targeted measures against illegal miners rather than punishing those who comply with regulations. He argues that a well-differentiated approach would serve the country better in dealing with the harmful effects of galamsey while preserving the livelihoods of those who are conducting their mining operations responsibly and legally.
